Skip to content
Ethics Dialogues

Ethics Dialogues

Recommendations from European Citizens to EBRAINS

Sissel Fibecker Ladegaard July 12, 2023 No Comments
Speech bubble, image by Volodomyr Hryschensko, Unsplash

To ensure the success of EBRAINS, the research infrastructure that became the product of the Human Brain Project, it is important that the public trusts researcher with their data. In order to do so, it is necessary to engage the public in a conversation about their vision and fears about sharing their data with a European health data infrastructure. Without the trust of European citizens, EBRAINS cannot uphold their end of the ethical and social contract between the European public, the brain researchers and the EBRAINS management. Public engagement can ensure that EBRAINS fulfils its ambition of being socially responsive and ethically responsible.

Fortunately for the entire EBRAINS project and their aims of empowering a new era of brain research, European citizens are not opposed to sharing their data with brain researchers. They do, however, have opinions on the direction of future brain research, that are key for ensuring a socially acceptable practice both for the management and utilization of the EBRAINS data infrastructure.  

In 2022, The Danish Board of Technology engaged European citizens and asked them about data sharing for a project like EBRAINS. By applying two different, complimentary engagement methods for a public engagement process across six European countries; Denmark, Germany, England, Spain, Hungary, and Italy. First, a classic workshop format where citizens, are accompanied by experts in different fields. This generated substantiated recommendations. Second, several online, self-organized citizen meetings where participants were guided by a platform with videos and questionnaires. An analysis of the recommendations generated across all six countries was condensed down to five recommendations which were substantiated by the results of the online meetings.

  1. Establish a multidisciplinary and independent European board to oversee and control the collection, access and sharing of data. A board must also ensure overall compliance with ethical guidelines.
  2. Communicate outcomes from brain research to the European public in a broad, transparent, and non-scientific way. The results are public goods, and better efforts must be made to ensure that citizens are educated about the outcome of health research and how to engage with it.
  3. Increase research focus on prevention and understanding rather than primarily medical treatment. This entails a focus on the societal impacts on brain health as well as the interplay between brain health and socio-cultural factors. Therefore, brain research should prioritize engaging with the public, including patients and citizens.
  4. Change funding priorities for brain research to improve distribution. It should be a priority to broaden the distribution of funds and to also ensure funding for non-profit research. This includes better ethical guidelines for funding as well as maximizing the funding to include overlooked brain diseases.
  5. Implement a citizen-centered approach to data collection, privacy, and security. This implies designing consent forms that are understandable for the general European citizen and initiating public education about how individual health data is stored, can be accessed, shared, and utilized.

These recommendations clearly show that when European citizens are informed about the current debates in brain research, they have a clear opinion about what brain research practices they find acceptable and how this research should be conducted.

With citizen perspectives collected, it is now up to all involved actors in EBRAINS and brain researchers at large to listen and to consider how to deliberate on the best implementation strategies. The report on recommendations from European citizens contains a detailed explanation of the recommendations themselves and more information about our methodology.

Download the report

Author Profile
Sissel Fibecker Ladegaard
Related Posts
    This author does not have any more posts.
Category : Events and Publications, Human Brain Project, Outreach and Dissemination Ethics, public engagement, Research Infrastructure, Responsible Research and Innovation
  • ← Human and Animal Data in EBRAINS
  • Raising awareness about research integrity in big projects →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ETHICS DIALOGUES

Supporting responsible research and innovation practices, ethical and philosophical reflection in the Human Brain Project.

Tweets by HBPSociety

Recent Posts

  • Implementing RRI in the HBP: an updated anthology
  • Equality in science: a call to reform working conditions for researchers
  • An overview of the ethical issues across the Human Brain Project
  • Social, ethical & reflective work in the Human Brain Project
  • Inconsistencies in the treatment of disorders of consciousness: 200+ professionals surveyed

Categories

  • Artificial intelligence (23)
  • Capacity Building (13)
  • Compliance (23)
  • Data Governance (39)
  • Data Protection (35)
  • Diversity (9)
  • Dual Use (2)
  • EBRAINS (5)
  • Ethics Advisory Board (12)
  • Ethics and Society (74)
  • Ethics Rapporteurs (15)
  • Ethics Support (33)
  • Events and Publications (54)
  • Gender and diversity (3)
  • HBP Mentoring Programme (3)
  • Human Brain Project (81)
    • Mentoring (3)
  • Intellectual Property (2)
  • Neuroethics (15)
  • Outreach and Dissemination (57)
    • Webinar (6)
  • Research Integrity (4)
  • Researcher Awareness (40)
  • Responsibility by Design (7)
  • Uncategorized (14)

Tags

#governance (2) #society (2) AI (3) Artificial Intelligence (42) BlackInHBP (1) Capacity Building (1) commercialisation (1) consciousness (7) Covid-19 (4) data (1) data ethics (17) DEOC (3) disorders of consciousness (1) diversity (8) Diversity and Equal Opportunities Committee (DEOC) (4) Dual Use (24) engagement (2) Ethics (57) ethics rapporteurs (2) ethics rapporteurs programme (2) GDPR (14) gender (6) governance (4) guidelines (1) HBP (5) Horizon 2020 (2) IP protection (1) Mentoring (2) neuro-ICT (3) Neuroethics (23) neurorobotics (4) Neuroscience (27) patent (1) philosophy (4) Platform Science (4) policy (2) public engagement (6) Research Infrastructure (20) Responsible Research and Innovation (69) robotics (3) RRI (31) SciComm (2) technology transfer (1) transparency (1) young researchers (7)

Archives

  • November 2023 (1)
  • October 2023 (2)
  • September 2023 (9)
  • August 2023 (5)
  • July 2023 (3)
  • June 2023 (3)
  • May 2023 (2)
  • April 2023 (3)
  • March 2023 (4)
  • February 2023 (1)
  • January 2023 (3)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (2)
  • October 2022 (2)
  • September 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (3)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (3)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (1)
  • December 2021 (5)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • July 2021 (3)
  • June 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • April 2021 (3)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (4)
  • November 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (5)
  • August 2020 (5)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (3)
  • December 2019 (3)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (4)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (3)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (2)
  • November 2018 (5)
  • October 2018 (4)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© 2025 Ethics Dialogues | Designed by: Theme Freesia | Powered by: WordPress
Ethics Dialogues blog follows HBP Privacy Policy. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT